Designing an app for U.S. citizens to de-mystify Congress and hold elected officials accountable.
This is its latest evolution as I prepare the MVP for development.
PROJECT TYPE
Client Project
THE TEAM
John McNicholas
(Product Manager)
& Myself!
MY ROLE
User Research
Wireframing
Brand Design
Prototyping
Usability Testing
TOOLS
Figma
DURATION
4 Months (2023)
Overview
Ideally, in a democracy, elected officials should vote on legislation in the same way their communities would vote. But with the lobbying efforts of political parties corrupting legislative decisions with billions of dollars, it's difficult to trust that our representatives will vote the way we want and expect.
John McNicholas noticed this issue in his home country of Ireland and in the U.S., and he had been thinking about building a digital solution for years. He reached out to me for design help and I happily took the challenge.
Here is the full problem I uncovered through user research, and the way I solved it.
The Problem
Bill descriptions are dense, and journalists are not thorough or unbiased enough to keep track of Congressional decisions for us. All the smoke and mirrors make it easy for representatives to go unchecked.
The Solution
I designed a mobile application with an unbiased, skimmable feed of legislation currently under debate in Congress. Users can keep tabs on their representatives to see how their votes compare to the community's.
Background
Across both political parties, Americans say their biggest issue with government is the sense of corruption among elected officials. As I read up on the public's perception of American government, it became clear that people are cynical of their democracy's integrity.
According to the Pew Research Center:
According to the Congressional Research Institute, lobbyists spent $3.47 billion on influencing policy and they are the ones monitoring Congress – not voters. For true accountability, voters would need to pay attention to the actions of those they vote into Congress, a complex task for most.
Competitive Analysis
I took some time to research competitors that have attempted to solve this problem. I concluded that there aren't many user-friendly mobile tools out there for tracking legislation and politican activity in one place. Most of them are just informative bill-trackers.
My main finding was that none of these tools offered a way to express your opinion and compare your votes with others – except for Brigade, which no longer exists. Brigade was acquired by Countable in 2018, and although it was engaging, it allowed too much of a forum for debate that became a space for only the loudest voices in the room.
Beyond just an updated list of bills, I saw an opportunity to create a space where the user would be able to interact with the legislation and compare their thoughts with politicians, without being influenced by commentary from other users.
User Interviews
More specifically, I wanted to learn their needs, motivations, and frustrations with their current methods of staying informed. I spoke to digital natives (ages 18-40) who are U.S. citizens and self-identify as politically active. Click here for my interview guide.
Objectives for 1:1 Interviews
Findings & Analysis
Affinity Map
With each major insight on a sticky note, I grouped the insights by similarity and topic. The following themes emerged:
A portion of the clusters that formed in my affinity map
"My knowledge of what Congress is doing pretty nebulous, I'd say. A lot goes on that we dont hear about because of volume of what they do. But I wouldn't know where to begin to find out those details.
– R.S., Participant
"If everyday citizens and community could be more involved, they’d be able to hold politicians accountable."
– L. W., Participant
Persona
I summarized the most glaring motivations, goals, and frustrations into a single persona to present to the client.
Feature Roadmap
From the three major frustrations that most interviewees expressed, I outlined two main features that this MVP could have. My client and I decided to limit the scope to the federal level rather than getting into the nitty gritty of state legislatures for this iteration.
Ideation & Design
Site Map
With features prioritized, I started piecing together the information architecture. John had initially envisioned a simple database with three sections: one for recommended bills sorted by topic, one for bills the user is following, and one to keep track of politician voting activity. I decided to cluster the first two under a home feed with "For You" and "Following" tabs, since that is a recognizable design pattern for apps with lots of content to parse through. I created a category specifically to look at members of Congress and what they're up to, like an address book with social profiles.
User Flows
Once I was happy with the content organization, I began thinking about how I wanted the user to interact with the app to accomplish some important goals – create an account, follow a bill, and complete the voting process. I included some decision points where a user may not want to pursue more information, or may want to skip a step.
I decided that users must vote in order to see how their districts and representatives voted, as an incentive to vote but also to prevent the bandwagon effect or bias for/against a certain politician.
Low-Fidelity Explorations
Here are some selected sketches, where I explored how a feed of legislation could look. I sketched how a bill might look as a summarized card, with the option to expand it in order to read more and interact with the bill further.
Branding
I wanted to avoid the sense of blandness and severity common in many political apps. Instead, I chose colors and fonts that feel playful and bold. Rather than going with primary red, white, and primary blue (as one would expect from an American politics app) I chose a tomato orange-red, teal, and cream to set the app apart and evoke a new way of looking at U.S. politics. The result is a style guide with a clean, warm, retro flair that will appeal to all generations.
High-Fidelity Prototype
Based on the happy paths in my user flows, I prototyped the key flows that would be most important for an MVP. The following screens went through major changes after usability testing.
Search for a topic, vote on a bill, and follow it
View senator information
Usability Test
In a mix of in-person and Zoom 1:1 usability tests, I tested the prototype with U.S. citizens of voting age who self-identified as politically active. I measured success by the number of user errors and the reported ease of navigation through the tasks. I also wanted to see how well the app addressed users' pain points, motivations, and goals.
Usability Test Insights & Priority Revisions
"It seems like the home screen would be a lot to sift through and figure out what to highlight. There’s proposed legislation that is never gonna pass!"
– L.M., test user
Overall, participants navigated through the flows with ease – there were no errors or hesitation of any kind across all five tests! However, they all had comments and questions about the content of the screens and the practicality of the features. A round of affinity mapping revealed patterns of user confusion around certain features, especially around the lack of filtering possibilities for so many thousands of bills.
I was a bit stuck on how to reorganize the Discover screen to make way for the new filters, topic recommendations, trending bills, ways for people to vote on bills their representatives have voted for, and followed bills. I began by doing some sketching.
Below is my final solution to that problem, as well as how I addressed the rest of the user feedback.
I made the bills screen more customizable.
With so many bills going through Congress at any given time, users expressed some confusion about the default order of bills. Users had different preferences on how they'd filter this screen, so I added more options for filtering and clarified the language.
I clarified the purpose of voting in the app.
Users did not immediately know that they could vote in the app upon opening it for the first time. It also wasn't clear to them that voting would allow them to unlock more insights in the app. I clarified this in the onboarding flow and added a module where users can go to vote specifically to get data on their opinions vs. those of their politicians.
I made it possible to filter through different kinds of alerts.
Users were most excited about the prospect of alerts about their representatives voting in an unexpected way. Since there are many types of alerts, I made them into filters.
What does "Yes" or "No" mean in the context of this bill?
A few users pointed out that bill language can be tricky, and sometimes it's not clear what "Yes" or "No" would do. I designed a way to tell, inspired by voter guides.
Next Steps
My next step is to conduct another round of usability testing to see if this latest iteration resonates with users. I am also exploring the addition of a feature that allows users to see exactly what text has been amended in a bill, with past language crossed out and new language highlighted.
When the design system is ready, I will pass the design off to a developer for deployment. Working on an app with potential for real social impact has been so rewarding, and I'm excited to continue it as a passion project.
More projects by me:
Let's stay in touch!
EMAIL alyssalongdesign@gmail.com
LINKEDIN linkedin.com/in/alyssalong13/
© 2024